PN proposal on buildings amnesty draws criticism

PN proposals for an amnesty for building irregularities have drawn a mixed reaction. The proposals would extend an amnesty on courtyard irregularities to entire buildings, provided the infringements are not serious and of no disturbance to neighbours. Owners would pay a fine to their local council. Developers’ Association president and Michael Falzon said the idea was good, especially for buildings constructed before Mepa was established, but there were so many subjective clauses it was hard to endorse. Those who back the proposal said it will make more buildings available for use and sale. Jerome Mamo, of Simon Mamo Real Estate said properties built before Mepa came into existence (in 1992) shouldn’t be penalised but there was no reason for sanctioning an illegal development built just 10 or 15 years ago. Full story in The Times.